Is a Fully Staffed Villa Better Than a 5-Star Resort?

In the upper reaches of luxury travel, the traditional 5-star resort has long been regarded as the benchmark of indulgence. Michelin-starred dining, flawless spas, infinity pools and private beaches have defined what it means to “holiday well.” Yet in the last decade, a quiet shift has taken place: affluent UK travellers, UHNW families and private office clients are increasingly opting for fully staffed private villas instead. The question is no longer whether villas are a viable alternative, but whether they may actually offer a superior experience to even the most prestigious resorts.

To understand the appeal, it helps to look at the numbers. According to the 2023 Knight Frank Wealth Report, over 40% of UHNW individuals prioritise privacy and personalisation as their primary travel motivators, a trend that intensified post-pandemic. Similarly, McKinsey’s 2022 luxury travel analysis found that high-end private rentals outpaced luxury hotel growth by over 20%, driven largely by families seeking space and bespoke service. These shifts suggest something deeper than trend-hopping; they reflect a change in what affluent travellers now define as “luxury.”

A fully staffed villa offers three core advantages that resorts simply cannot replicate: privacy, control and personalisation. Privacy is perhaps the most obvious. At a villa, there are no shared pools, no breakfast queues, no cabanas to reserve, and no possibility of bumping into influencers on holiday. For UK-based clients who value discretion, especially those in finance, private schools, media or politics, this privacy is not indulgence — it is comfort.

Control is the second pillar. Resorts operate on systems: restaurant schedules, spa bookings, room service hours, shared amenities and compulsory check-out times. Villas operate on the guest’s rhythm instead. Meals happen when you want them, not when the resort kitchen is open. Pools are available 24/7 without lifeguard limits. Chefs adjust menus based on allergies and preferences rather than preset dining concepts. Parents with young children often describe this as the highest form of convenience — no need to drag toddlers to hotel dining rooms at set times or navigate the politics of sun loungers.

The third advantage is personalisation. Fully staffed villas can operate like private households: chefs, butlers, housekeepers, spa therapists, drivers and children’s nannies can be arranged according to lifestyle, not just availability. This isn’t upselling — it’s tailoring. For example, guests can request plant-based menus, morning pilates sessions, sunset massages, candlelit dinners and guided cultural tours without the resort template shaping their day. For UHNW families and private office clients, this level of curation feels effortless in a way that hotel concierges, however competent, rarely manage.

But to claim that villas are universally superior would ignore the strengths of 5-star resorts. Resorts still excel in variety and atmosphere, offering impressive spa complexes, state-of-the-art gyms, kids’ clubs, boutiques, beach clubs and signature restaurants that would be difficult to recreate within a private villa setting. Solo travellers, adventurous couples, or culture-seekers moving between city and sea may value the energy and community that resorts naturally provide. Resorts also remove the administrative layer — guests do not need to think about staff coordination or transport because the framework already exists.

There is also the geographic factor. A villa in Saint-Tropez or Antigua may offer blissful privacy, but a resort in Marrakech or the Maldives can deliver architectural theatre and immersive programming that villas cannot replicate. It comes down to intention: do you want stimulus, or do you want stillness?

The psychology of luxury offers another layer. A resort broadcasts status — the brand, the address, the design, the clientele all signal participation in a global luxury culture. A villa, by contrast, retreats from all of that. For many UHNW individuals in the UK, the true currency of luxury today is not visibility but invisibility. A villa holiday feels like disappearing — in the best possible way.

So, is a fully staffed villa better than a 5-star resort? The answer depends entirely on how you define “better.” If luxury means privacy, personalisation, family togetherness and living like you own the place, then yes — the fully staffed villa wins decisively. If luxury means variety, curated energy, amenities and social vibrancy, a top-tier resort remains unmatched.

The truth is, these two models rarely compete for the same traveller at the same time. Many affluent UK families spend summers in villas and winters in resorts. Many honeymooners start in a resort and finish in a villa. Many UHNW travellers blend both within a single journey.

What has changed — and what matters — is that the fully staffed villa has graduated from “alternative accommodation” to a new expression of luxury living, and in many cases, a superior one. In a world where time, privacy and control have replaced chandeliers and champagne as the ultimate markers of wealth, the villa offers something that even the finest resort struggles to match: the feeling of being at home in a place you do not own.

If you are interested in complimentary advice, you can contact James https://jamesnightingall.com/contact